Search for: "Commonwealth v. Friday" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
This is significant, when we compare this judgment with the attitude of the English Court of Appeal in the 1994 case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Rees-Mogg. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
(for a detailed discussion of why field sobriety test refusal cannot be used against a defendant at trial read Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
As the National Transportation Safety Board summarized the accident: On Friday January 12, 2007 at approximately 2:30 p.m. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
A “hot tub” of academics gave collective evidence on Friday, with Inquiry questions focussing on regulation of the press. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am by INFORRM
We rounded up phone hacking developments in a post on Friday. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by Joshua Matz
Massachusetts is not retroactive on collateral review in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Paul A. Prados
  Essentially, if a case involves interpretation or enforcement of Federal law, which includes the Federal Constitution, the Commonwealth of Virginia has the power to remove the case from state court into Federal Court.On Friday April 22, the Commonwealth of Virginia removed such a case from the Circuit Court for Hanover County to the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by cdw
A number of stories we’ve either missed or that have been developing in recent days On Monday, the Third Circuit in James Lambert v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:35 pm by cdw
Under errata, there is  Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
The agreement filed Friday in federal court in Indianapolis also requires Bloomington-based Hoosier Energy to spend $5 million on environmental mitigation projects to resolve the dispute over changes it made to the 1,000-megawatt Merom power plant in southwestern Indiana. [read post]