Search for: "Comstock v. Comstock" Results 121 - 140 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2012, 7:34 am by Randy Barnett
 As Justice Kennedy correctly noted in Comstock, it comes not from the New Deal Court, but from the 1955 Warren Court case of Williamson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Big Tent Democrat
Comstock, the Court said: The question presented is whether the Necessary and Proper Clause, Art. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
 Under such a principle, if Congress simply wants to encourage market activity, it must use prohibitions of the Wickard v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by JB
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Brannon Denning
The other shoe to drop, after Raich, I think, was the Court’s decision in Comstock v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
 But evaluated through the political frame of Bush v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today for review of EPA's final Utility MACT rule, in National Mining Association v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Jan 30: An economic analysis prepared by The Brattle Group -- The Employment Impacts of Proposed Tariffs on Chinese Manufactured Photovoltaic Cells and Modules -- finds that a 100% tariff on imported solar PV cells and modules from China would result in as many as 50,000 net lost jobs in the U.S. over the next three years. [read post]