Search for: "Conte v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Since all of the requested information was not provided, the 30-day period in which Progressive was obligated to pay or deny the Hospital's claim did not begin to run as was held in Westchester Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Hospital for Joint Diseases v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co, New York & Presbyterian Hosp v Countrywide Insurance Co. and Montefiore Medical Center v Government Employees Insurance Co. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
  Similarly, the FDA Law Blog’s post highlights a statement in last week’s United States Supreme Court denial of certiorariin Whitman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, Florida courts, as in Montgomery v State, State v Mason and Smith v State, have held that a nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld is generally considered a conviction for purposes of determining a defendant's sentence for subsequent convictions. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:07 am by Walter Olson
I can’t say I’ve made a study of Judge Graves’ overall career as a jurist in the Mississippi state courts, but if his record presiding over the notorious O’Keefe v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
” [Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown on Jarchow v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 8:10 am by Steven Boranian
It also gives us an opportunity to criticize (again) the wrongly reasoned and wrongly decided Conte v. [read post]