Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
Cooper Supreme Court decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day United Company Rusal, plc v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court decided Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:25 am
On Oct. 13, the Artemis Accords Principles for a Safe, Peaceful, and Prosperous Future, commonly referred to as the Artemis Accords, were signed by their eight founding member states: Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
In Chappell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the terms of two parties’ Merger and Cooperation Agreements were not incorporated into a Master Settlement Agreement entered into by only one of the parties. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Modified Opinion issued in Facebook v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:34 am
The appellants in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:34 am
The appellants in U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 5:40 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:45 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:15 am
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (1999), but says it has been undercut by Murphy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
Vance rejected the notion that Apple should be forced to cooperate only in certain prominent crimes. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:07 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:20 pm
United States 17-830 Issue: Whether the exclusion of testimony on the specific length of the mandatory minimum sentence faced by a cooperating witness violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to cross-examination. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
This Essay reveals the intersection of the Court’s pretext and excessive force doctrines by unearthing their shared roots in the 1973 United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
United States v Roberts, 618 F2d 530), nor did her testimony usurp the jury's function to assess the informant's credibility (see People v Hayes, 226 AD2d 1055, 1056 lv denied 88 NY2d 936). [read post]