Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 121 - 140 of 98,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 7:53 pm by Josh Blackman
Among others involved were Andy Oldham (5th Circuit), Jimmy Blacklock (Supreme Court of Texas), Brantley Starr (NDTX), Cam Barker (EDTX), Scott Keller, and more that I'm forgetting. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
I suspect the vote will be close either way.And then the Supreme Court may well take the case up.In short, I suspect this is very much not the last word on this subject.We'll see. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm by bklemm@foley.com
      The Supreme Court was tasked with deciding whether the NLRB was required to satisfy a more lenient two-part test for a preliminary injunction (established by the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
  The Supreme Court, however, has delayed the January 6 election interference prosecution by taking up the question of presidential immunity; as a result, the case may not be tried until after the November election (if it’s ever tried at all). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:15 am by Alexander Stein
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
” A more thorough analysis was required under Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
Binance Illinois Supreme Court Authorizes Biometric Lawsuits Without Any Allegation of Harm–Rosenbach v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:52 am by Dan Farber
 Obama’s signature climate policy, the Clean Power Plan, would not have been overturned by the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And when they do, their cases rarely make it very far.Because the Supreme Court grants review mostly in cases presenting questions that have divided the lower courts, its docket has a selection bias for difficult cases, those in which plausible arguments can be made for a variety of results. [read post]