Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office" Results 121 - 140 of 5,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 9:35 am by William McGrath
" The defendants argued that the statute provides that no public company (including an officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of that company) may discriminate against an employee of such public company for engaging in protected whistleblowing activity. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:44 pm by Bennett L. Epstein
  In that case, the Court decided that a police officer who was permitted to access the department’s data files for law enforcement purposes did not violate the CFAA when he received $6,000 from an undercover police officer to check whether another person was also an undercover police officer. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:39 pm by Jeff Welty
Some courts have held that a name clearing hearing must be public, at least if the employee so requests. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Restricting speech that owes its existence to a public employee's professional responsibilities does not infringe any liberties the employee might have enjoyed as a private citizen. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:41 am
" A bipartisan group of commissioners, nine of the 17, sponsored the resolution claiming that Stroger has reason to fire Burnette for employee mismanagement that has slowed work of the public defender's office and for creating financial liability in suing Stroger last November over cuts in workers, pay and benefits. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 11:28 am by Benjamin Herbst
  The government takes public corruption cases extremely seriously, and offenses involving correctional employees are no exception. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:24 am by Thomas Dorn Jr
The post New Jersey’s Courts Address the Tort Claims Act and Rule that Individuals Injured by Public Employees or on Public Property Must Follow the 90-Day Notice Requirement, or the Claim Will be Dismissed appeared first on Einhorn Barbarito. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:24 am by Thomas Dorn Jr
The post New Jersey’s Courts Address the Tort Claims Act and Rule that Individuals Injured by Public Employees or on Public Property Must Follow the 90-Day Notice Requirement, or the Claim Will be Dismissed appeared first on Einhorn Barbarito. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Determining eligibility for representation and indemnification of public employees being suedSalino v Cimino, 1 N.Y.3d 166 Public Officers Law Sections 17 [state officers and employees] and 18 [municipal employees] and other local laws provide for the representation and, if found liable, the indemnification, of officers and employees of the jurisdiction who are being sued -- a significant benefit to such individuals. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ever since the Supreme Court in 2006 revised the legal standards governing when public employees engage in First Amendment speech, plaintiffs have had a difficult time winning their cases, as courts usually find that the plaintiff did not speak as a citizen but as an employee spoke out pursuant to his official job duties. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Attorney General Fires 11 Staff Members [Washington Post] Facing Budget 'Crisis,' Public Defenders May Refuse Cases [ABC News] ABC: Budget Cuts Causing "Crisis" in Public Defenders' Offices [WSJ Law Blog] Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: The D.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
”“We therefore affirm the court's decision on public policy grounds. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:06 pm by Jon L. Gelman
In addressing the public policy argument, the Court interpreted the insurance policy's language by the insurance carrier, who asserted that it had no duty to defend under the employer's liability insurance policy with Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It also will throw into disarray tens of thousands of collective-bargaining agreements governing millions of teachers, police officers, fire-fighters, first responders and other public employees. [read post]