Search for: "Court Employees of Public Defender's Office"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2014, 11:39 am
Further, said the Commissioner, “Education Law §3811 also applies wherever a board member, officer or employee defends 'any action or proceeding' (Education Law §3811[1]), a prerequisite not met here. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
" The defendants argued that the statute provides that no public company (including an officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent of that company) may discriminate against an employee of such public company for engaging in protected whistleblowing activity. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:44 pm
In that case, the Court decided that a police officer who was permitted to access the department’s data files for law enforcement purposes did not violate the CFAA when he received $6,000 from an undercover police officer to check whether another person was also an undercover police officer. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:39 pm
Some courts have held that a name clearing hearing must be public, at least if the employee so requests. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:54 am
A public park patron filed suit after being struck by a rock thrown from a passing lawnmower. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
In addition to the DMV employees, 16 other defendants were charged in the complaint. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
In addition to the DMV employees, 16 other defendants were charged in the complaint. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:41 am
" A bipartisan group of commissioners, nine of the 17, sponsored the resolution claiming that Stroger has reason to fire Burnette for employee mismanagement that has slowed work of the public defender's office and for creating financial liability in suing Stroger last November over cuts in workers, pay and benefits. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 1:32 pm
The director provides confidential and impartial assistance to judges and court employees, including Federal Public Defender’s Office employees, on workplace conduct matters. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:58 am
"Restricting speech that owes its existence to a public employee's professional responsibilities does not infringe any liberties the employee might have enjoyed as a private citizen. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 11:28 am
The government takes public corruption cases extremely seriously, and offenses involving correctional employees are no exception. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:24 am
The post New Jersey’s Courts Address the Tort Claims Act and Rule that Individuals Injured by Public Employees or on Public Property Must Follow the 90-Day Notice Requirement, or the Claim Will be Dismissed appeared first on Einhorn Barbarito. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:24 am
The post New Jersey’s Courts Address the Tort Claims Act and Rule that Individuals Injured by Public Employees or on Public Property Must Follow the 90-Day Notice Requirement, or the Claim Will be Dismissed appeared first on Einhorn Barbarito. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Determining eligibility for representation and indemnification of public employees being suedSalino v Cimino, 1 N.Y.3d 166 Public Officers Law Sections 17 [state officers and employees] and 18 [municipal employees] and other local laws provide for the representation and, if found liable, the indemnification, of officers and employees of the jurisdiction who are being sued -- a significant benefit to such individuals. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
Defendants moved for an interlocutory appeal and the district court certified a “controlling question of law” to the First Circuit. [read post]
17 May 2018, 6:43 am
Ever since the Supreme Court in 2006 revised the legal standards governing when public employees engage in First Amendment speech, plaintiffs have had a difficult time winning their cases, as courts usually find that the plaintiff did not speak as a citizen but as an employee spoke out pursuant to his official job duties. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Attorney General Fires 11 Staff Members [Washington Post] Facing Budget 'Crisis,' Public Defenders May Refuse Cases [ABC News] ABC: Budget Cuts Causing "Crisis" in Public Defenders' Offices [WSJ Law Blog] Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: The D.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:01 am
”“We therefore affirm the court's decision on public policy grounds. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:50 pm
At the Law Offices of John S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:06 pm
In addressing the public policy argument, the Court interpreted the insurance policy's language by the insurance carrier, who asserted that it had no duty to defend under the employer's liability insurance policy with Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company. [read post]