Search for: "Court of Psychiatric Clinic"
Results 121 - 140
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2018, 8:48 am
In US v Crabtree a therapist at a health care clinic in Miami was convicted along with her two therapist codefendants of conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:48 am
In US v Crabtree a therapist at a health care clinic in Miami was convicted along with her two therapist codefendants of conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
Rather than get bogged down in semantics or spend all day comparing and contrasting how different courts have defined these terms, for the purposes of this article, we intend to utilize the terms interchangeably. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
Yet, under NRS 433.164, Offender A will likely not qualify to participate in Nevada’s mental health court program because Offender A’s “clinically significant disorder” did not prevent him or her from conducting the functions of daily living. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:35 am
More Blog Posts: New York Appeals Court Rules that Psychiatric Malpractice Claim Cannot be Dismissed Because of Procedural Technicality, Rochester Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Blog, November 28, 2017 Couples Sue New York Fertility Clinic Over Eggs With Genetic Defect, Rochester Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Blog, November 22, 2017 New York Jury Rules in Favor of Plaintiff in Birth Injury Claim Against a Brooklyn Medical Center, Rochester… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:31 am
More Blog Posts: New York Appeals Court Rules that Psychiatric Malpractice Claim Cannot be Dismissed Because of Procedural Technicality, Rochester Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Blog, November 28, 2017 Couples Sue New York Fertility Clinic Over Eggs With Genetic Defect, Rochester Medical Malpractice and Personal Injury Blog, November 22, 2017 New York Jury Rules in Favor of Plaintiff in Birth Injury Claim Against a Brooklyn Medical Center, Rochester… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:37 pm
Both the clinical records and her discovery evidence should have reinforced that assertion. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:39 am
In the 2003, Texas Supreme Court opinion, Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am
If the Court decides that Ms. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
Bruce too stood onstage in his last years for interminable periods, court papers in hand, quoting himself to audiences bored to insanity by the spectacle. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
Alas, we don’t need the intimate privacy and authoritative atmosphere of the clinic to make a symptomatic diagnosis of narcissistic megalomania. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:13 am
In the psychiatric unit, a clinical social worker performed a Patient/Family Services Consult. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
I represented a group of clinical psychologists on an ongoing basis. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
The highest criminal court in Texas, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, reacted to the Supreme Court’s ban by creating its own standard for reviewing findings of intellectual disability – a test that diverged markedly from the clinical approach endorsed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
Abortion is only lawful there if there is a threat of long term psychiatric or physical injury to the mother. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court dismissed the women’s appeal by a narrow majority (3-2). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Therefore, it explains, the question presented by this case – “what kind of psychiatric assistance due process required” – was not before the court in Ake. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Because the concept of insanity is not a clinical one, there are no clinical standards to which courts could defer. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 7:43 pm
There is a steady pull in the clinical world to transform capacity into a technical concept that can be tested objectively, usually by calling for a psychiatric consult. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held that the CCA erred in applying the Briseno factors coupled with an older clinical standard and that it should have used up-to-date clinical standards to determine intellectual disability. [read post]
