Search for: "Craig v. Doe" Results 121 - 140 of 812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” He goes on to say: As this danger does not exist for the French race, the French public has become accustomed to treating the Negro with familiarity and indulgence. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Ross Guberman
The lyricism of “women as men’s quiescent companions” could inspire, but the potency of “intermediate scrutiny” would help win Craig v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Russell Spivak
As I’ve written previously on Lawfare, in that case: The court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Rachael Hanna
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The first claim (Craig Wright v Magnus Granath [2020] EWHC 51 (QB)) relates to Magnus Granath, a citizen of Norway, resident in Oslo, tweeting under the Twitter handle @hodlonaut. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:21 pm
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm by Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner
Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner are deputy solicitors general for the State of Nevada, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of five states in support of the respondents in University of Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
   By contrast, the party briefs and many of the amicus briefs filed in support of Colorado Civil Rights Commission (CCRC) and Craig and Mullins, the couple for whom Phillips refused to bake a cake, stressed that motive did not matter: discrimination laws aimed at conduct. [read post]