Search for: "Creek v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Consider the recent example of South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a substantial portion of the state of Oklahoma—including most of the city of Tulsa—is an Indian reservation of the Creek Nation. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies) Dossett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
§ 1151 (definition of Indian country); § 1153(a) (providing for exclusive federal jurisdiction for enumerated crimes). [2] United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:53 pm
Webinar Narrative: The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on May 11, 2020 in McGirt v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
The U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
