Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 10:34 am
[Cross-posted on my blog, Managing Miracles] On Monday, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Arlington v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm
The judgment The statement of the law in this area was summarised by the Court of Appeal in Imerman v Echenguiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908, in which Lord Neuberger MR said “where a privileged document had been seen by an opposing party through fraud or mistake, the court has power to exercise its equitable confidentiality jurisdiction, and ‘should ordinarily intervene, unless the case is one where the injunction can properly be refused on the general principles affecting the… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
But it is people power that can make the biggest difference. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
New Relists Donziger v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:15 am
Judgment Released: September 3, 2010 Link to Judgment In an action relating to default under a mortgage, the Court dismissed a motion and cross-motion for summary judgment brought by the parties. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
The power company can’t just turn off a customer’s power. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm
Yet Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
(See Alicia T. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:44 am
(We can hope that the Court will at least loosen that rule when it decides Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
Yesterday in No. 07-330, Greenlaw v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
In Zakharov v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
But in Worthy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
"The Court held in R.A.V. v St. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
" The Appellate Division then observed that the arbitrator exceeds his or her power where his or her award "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power," citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, appeal dismissed37 NY3d 1032, lv denied 37 NY3d 919 [see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
Moreover, in Rubin v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
Moreover, in Rubin v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
Moreover, in Rubin v. [read post]
