Search for: "Cutter v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
O Centro Beneficente do Uniao do Vegetal (Brazilian spiritist church plaintiffs seeking to drink hallucinogenic tea); Cutter v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Cutter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
REMEMBER, under Brendlin v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:25 am
To provide some context to the Landers decision, the Ninth Circuit stated that before the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:25 am
To provide some context to the Landers decision, the Ninth Circuit stated that before the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:27 am
Plaintiff also relied on 44 cookie-cutter declarations that, in nearly identical wording, stated that the signing employees faced occasions where “meal periods were not made available to me. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
In Cutter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
Back in 2005, in Cutter v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court Precedent That Matters the Most The legal debate revolves around dictum in the Court’s unanimous decision, Cutter v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:16 am
” (And, in protesting that the declarations were “cookie-cutter,” Gawker undermined its own position, the court observed.) [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
State, supra.Clay v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The article discussed the current state of penalties that drivers can face if charged with DUI in Arizona. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
United States (1970) and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
Indeed, in its opinion the Court majority acknowledged once more that "[i]t is certainly true that in applying RFRA 'courts must take adequate account of the burdens a requested accommodation may impose on nonbeneficiaries.'” (quoting Cutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
., the O Centro case from 2006, or Cutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Or are her and Justice Breyer’s views in this passage somehow reconcilable with their views in O Centro, her opinion (joined by Justice Breyer) in Cutter v. [read post]
