Search for: "D. (D.) VS. S. (A.), ET AL."
Results 121 - 140
of 372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Here’s how I put the point in my contribution to a treatise of which I am a co-author, Lafave, et. al., Criminal Procedure, 4.4(d): [T]he line between content and non-content information is inherently relative. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am
UCF ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondent. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
SANFORD D. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:45 am
(c) Toder et al Case Study, point 1: Why did the U.K. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 4:23 pm
On plaintiff’s motion, the trial court granted (and the appellate court upheld) an order sealing those exhibits post-filing, irrespective of the limitations otherwise applicable under CRC 2.550 et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Lee et al., An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 Ariz. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 06-10446-RGS. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
City of San Jose, et al., __ Cal.App.4th __, 2014 WL 2987959 (6th Dist. 2014). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
DATA TARGETING, INC., et al., Respondents. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
WEINER, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.The Law Lady. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
S A FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, d/b/a OEC LATIN AMERICA, Appellee. 3rd District.Civil procedure -- Dismissal -- Failure to prosecute -- Error to grant motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where movant did not provide required sixty-day notice required by revised rule and neither movant nor trial court recognized three instances of record activity preceding dismissal -- Any filing of record during applicable time frame is sufficient to… [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Court, D. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The battle over the BDCP is taking on the characteristics of the typical Northern vs. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VERONICA BONCROFT and SCOTT RUBINCHIK, Appellees. 4th District.Arbitration -- Trial court erred in denying motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration on ground that there are five other cases between the parties in the same probate division, where this case is based on an operating agreement containing an arbitration clause, and the other five cases are notBARRY BERK, et al., Appellants, vs. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:46 pm
Aún después de las enmiendas de 2004 y 2006, el servicio alternativo ofrecido no tiene una naturaleza claramente civil, y las condiciones, particularmente la duración, tienen un carácter punitivo. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:04 am
The legal profession seems to have forgotten that it was the elite organized bar (the ABA, the ABCNY, et al.) who lobbied vigorously in the 1920's and 30's to bring legal education within the university, both to improve quality and to associate the profession with the social prestige of the university. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:27 am
[et. al.] [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Psychiatry Piquero, Alex R., et al. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:54 am
Dynasty, Inc., d/b/a Boom Boom Room Studio 54 et. al, Op. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
Specifically, the Appellate Court (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) in the case of Plotnik vs Meihaus, et al., upheld our clients’ Orange County Superior Court jury verdict on this important issue when the court held, at page 19, that… “…we uphold both the economic and emotional distress damages plaintiffs recovered for trespass to personal property arising from Meihaus’s act of intentionally striking Romeo with a bat. [read post]
