Search for: "D.J.2"
Results 121 - 140
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
Jennen, No. 09-30146 (2-24-10) (Gould joined by Tallman and Benitez, D.J.). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:19 am
D.J.).Should the court have ordered a competency hearing sua sponte of the defendant in this RICO gang prosecution? [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:20 pm
Ruiz-Gaxiola, No. 08-10378 (9-24-10) (Reinhardt with Kozinski and Timlin, D.J.). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) In the Matter of D.J. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
In an unpublished opinion, the Second Circuit (Calabresi, Hall and Sessions, D.J.) remands this case to the Eastern District of New York because the trial court reduced the requested attorneys' fees without providing sufficient reasons for that reduction. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:28 am
The Court of Appeals (Hall, Straub and Eaton [D.J.]) reinstates the case.Leifer was subjected to six hostile comments from supervisors over a three-year period. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:17 am
Carol Cupp (NFP) In the Matter of D.J. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
The district court granted Barner's suppression motion, but the Court of Appeals (Sack, Raggi and Eaton [D.J.]) upholds the search. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
(2) The admission of the SSA records violated the confronbtation clause. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:42 am
Lantz, decided on March 2. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Tello, No. 08-50579 (4-7-10) (Gould with Ikuta and George, Senior D.J.). [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:42 am
(2) The foreseeable risk of economic harm is not required when evaluating a breach of honest services fiduciary duty, but instead the test of fraudulent intent and materiality. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
Valdovinos-Mendez, No. 09-50532 (2-15-11) (Jarvey, D.J., S.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:46 am
But the Court of Appeals (Hall, Lohier and Reiss [D.J. in dissent]) says "the Student-Plaintiffs have not been 'directly affected' by the payment of the IDEA settlements in support of religious institutions; they have only been indirectly affected. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:59 pm
Id.at *2. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:22 am
Ruffin, 816 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2016).The Court (Walker and Shea [D.J.], over Judge Jacobs' dissent) also reinstates Bellamy's civil case against the detectives because he adequately alleges the police withheld evidence that would have helped Bellamy's criminal defense. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 10:36 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:34 am
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Lohier and Reiss [D.J.]) reinstates it. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:06 am
The Second Circuit (Wesley, Carney and Rakoff [D.J.]) rejects that argument, for the following reasons:1. [read post]
