Search for: "D.J.2"
Results 121 - 140
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
Sorrell decided on July 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:06 am
The Second Circuit (Wesley, Carney and Rakoff [D.J.]) rejects that argument, for the following reasons:1. [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:10 pm
Garza, No. 12-10294 (Tallman with Ikuta and O'Connell, D.J.). [read post]
18 May 2014, 10:15 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:59 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm
Id.at *2. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
But as the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Pooler and Reiss [D.J.]) writes:McCulloch presents no evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that the Defendants harbored animus against Hispanics, or that animus played a role in the restrictions imposed on McCulloch’s subdivision. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
But in the aggregate, the trial court said (and the Court of Appeals [Raggi, Chin and D'Agostino (D.J.)] agrees) that management's reaction to plaintiff's complaints of discrimination was not serious enough to prove retaliation. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
Garcia-Santana, No. 12-10471 (2-20-14)(Berzon with Alarcon and Zouhary, D.J.) [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: “Back That Azz Up”/ “Back That Ass Up” and Jerome Temple, professionally known as D.J. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:29 am
Hammond, No. 12-30337 (2-7-14)(Murphy, D.J., with Tallman and Bea). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Carter, No. 12-10549 (2-7-14)(Per curiam with Wallace and Berzon; dissent by Zouhary, D.J.). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:25 pm
Williams, No. 12-30353 (2-3-14)(Rakoff, Sr D.J., with McKeown and Clifton). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:18 pm
If that were not true, a simple denial by a corporate officer that the officer ever communicated the plaintiff’s complaint, no matter how reasonable the inference of communication, would prevent the plaintiff from satisfying her prima facie case, despite the fact that the prima facie case requires only a de minimis showing."2. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:17 am
A corporate officer will be found jointly and severally liable with his corporation for copyright infringement if he (1) had the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity, and (2) has a direct financial interest in such activities. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:22 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Sept. 6, 2013), decision available here.Players: Decision by Judge Milan Smith, joined by D.J. [read post]
