Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL"
Results 121 - 140
of 8,669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff; and Chief… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
It also suggests a modest resolution to SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:06 am
Daniel Glover, Andrew Matheson, Barry Sookman, Connor Bildfell, Greer Hope, Natalie Kolos and Nico Rullmann write that in a 5:4 split, a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada recently held in R. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Pfizer v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
It also suggests a modest resolution to SEC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
, we will examine its conclusions and ponder what’s to become of the problems the saga highlighted in our registration system)Moderator: Darren MealePanellists:Natasza Shilling, Lead Counsel, Vodafone George Sevier, Head of IP Enforcement, Brands and Licensing, DysonHHJ Melissa Clarke, Senior Circuit Judge, Designated Civil Judge for Oxford and Thames Valley at the Courts of England Wales Daniel Alexander KC, Barrister, 8 New Square 18:15-19:30 –… [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
Daniel Grütters appeared on behalf of the Appellant (instructed by Morrsion Spowart). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
MILLER v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Editor’s note: This article is part of Just Security’s series on reparation mechanisms in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:11 am
In his introduction, Ted Davis opines that the Supreme Court's ruling in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
v=WgcrmuKK-iY&t. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince and McNatt v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am
The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd v Cash Crusaders Franchisees Listed on Annexure ‘ADP1’ to the Founding Affidavit of Andries Daniel Du Plooy (16453/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 11 related to a dispute between Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd and franchisees arising from a systemic change by Cash Crusaders of the rules pertaining to pawn transactions. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
” Bragg based the gag order restrictions on the 1966 United States Supreme Court case Sheppard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
