Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL"
Results 121 - 140
of 8,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Editor’s note: This article is part of Just Security’s series on reparation mechanisms in the context of Russia’s war against Ukraine. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:11 am
In his introduction, Ted Davis opines that the Supreme Court's ruling in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
v=WgcrmuKK-iY&t. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince and McNatt v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am
The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd v Cash Crusaders Franchisees Listed on Annexure ‘ADP1’ to the Founding Affidavit of Andries Daniel Du Plooy (16453/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 11 related to a dispute between Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd and franchisees arising from a systemic change by Cash Crusaders of the rules pertaining to pawn transactions. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
” Bragg based the gag order restrictions on the 1966 United States Supreme Court case Sheppard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
IP: Maria Chiara Marullo; «Acceso a la justicia en el contexto de abusoscorporativos: la litigación como estrategia de resistencia y de empoderamiento a las víctimas (AC-CJUSTEDH)» (ref: ICI023/23/000001), financiado por el Instituto Catalán Internacional para la Paz.IP: Daniel Iglesias Márquez.4Revista Española de Empresas y Derechos Humanos, n. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Stephen Taeusch, Daniel Turinsky, and Carsten Reichel; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/01/what-to-know-about-noncompete-agreements-in-2024 As we head into 2024, employers can expect more risk related to the use of restrictive covenants at both the federal and state level. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Jones-Doherty, Morally Regulatable Lives: Corporate Sovereignty, the Rise of Burwell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Good afternoon. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“Frankly, I can't give any explanation for why the authors have been so dilatory,” Daniel Boorstin, Librarian of Congress, told the New York Times in 1983. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
