Search for: "DAYS v. READING AREA WATER AUTHORITY"
Results 121 - 140
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
However, the report noted New York’s rainy day reserves are less than half their authorized levels and no additional deposits are planned. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
However, the report noted New York’s rainy day reserves are less than half their authorized levels and no additional deposits are planned. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:03 pm
The agency has informed importers they must avoid oysters from areas closed by French authorities. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:51 am
AB 5 codifies the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
Russel Covington, et al v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Or, as the Supreme Court noted in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:06 pm
Read our discussion of AB 51’s scary implications here. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
But who would want to read that?! [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Over the next day, Mikayla did little but drink ice water, sleep, and go to the bathroom. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
