Search for: "DB v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Galizia has also had 19 libel claims filed against her by the db group, who claim that she has attacked the group in several posts. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
DB Investments, Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 15 November and Wednesday 16 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of DB v Chief Constable of Police Service Northern Ireland. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
DB Investments, Inc., 2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,736. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
DB v Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland (NI), heard 15-16 November 2016. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
DB Investments, Inc., No. 08-2784, will appear at 2010-2 Trade Cases ¶77,090.Further information regarding CCH Trade Regulation Reporter appears here on the CCH Online Store. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:48 am
Brentwood Industries v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:36 pm
***************************************** On Thursday, April 30, the New York Court of Appeals heard oral argument in ACE Securities Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:12 pm
DB Investments, Inc., 667 F.3d 273, 308 (3d Cir. 2011), which held that state law variations do not matter for settlements since no trial will commence. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am
Brent London Borough Council v Shulem B Association Ltd (2011) EWHC 1663 (Ch), (2011) 1 WLR 3014, and Skelton v DBS Homes (Kings Hill) Ltd (2017) EWCA Civ 1139, (2018) 1 WLR 362 both found the necessity of a valid demand for payment. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Sykes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 5:58 pm
Worked but difficult and v e r y slow. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:14 am
The fact that the lessees were made aware that a charge would be made for that period, by the RTM schedule and by the 2017 demand, does not amount to compliance with section 20B (Skelton v DBS Homes (Kings Hill) Limited (2017) EWCA Civ 1139 paragraph 18: “it is not enough under section 20B that the tenant has received the information that his landlord proposes to make a demand”). [read post]
