Search for: "DE SIMONE v. UNITED STATES" Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
  Bickel escaped the Holocaust by emigrating as a child to the United States from Romania. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Stone (1936), ‘The Common Law in the United States’ 5. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:07 am by brown
Vincent de Paul Catholic School, war against womenLocation: Indiana [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Some of the pre-argument coverage of the case – including Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Marco Simons in a guest editorial at CNN, and Michael Bobelian at Forbes  – discussed Kiobel in the context of Citizens United and corporate personhood. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
In a comment piece by Edzard Ernst, the Guardian drew attention to the British Chiropractic Association’s recent account of its libel action against Simon Singh. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
Criminal affairs in Liberia In January of 2006, Simon Rosenblum, an Israeli businessman and member of Charles Taylor’s inner circle during his regime, invited Klein to Liberia. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There was an interesting apology in the Times newspaper on Saturday 4 February, to a financial adviser, JP Loveland of Hanover de Broke, for three articles about financial “mis-selling” – one published in 2008, two in 2010. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
Federal Election Commission, in which a federal district court upheld a federal ban on campaign contributions by foreigners, as limiting the scope of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:53 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Whether a trial court has subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
” Est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded… [read post]