Search for: "DOWNING v. THORNTON"
Results 121 - 140
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
So the decision throws down all sorts of gauntlets. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
Modi v Clarke and International Management Group (UK) Ltd v Clarke, heard 13 and 16 May 2011 (Tugendhat J) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd heard 18 May 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
On Friday 13 May 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat will hear an application concerning mode of trial in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am
http://tinyurl.com/2e82fnb (Orange Legal Technologies) HP Exec Spills Huge Company Secret On LinkedIn Profile - http://tinyurl.com/3dcrndv (Matt Rosoff) ILTA London Reviewed - http://tinyurl.com/3vdztue (Joanna Goodman) IT Pros Cross-Examine Digital Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/3npm69z (Kim Davis) It's Time Users Demand Better Data Handling - http://tinyurl.com/3hflkfv (Scott Koegler) Lifecycle Management: Fixed v Dynamic Content - http://tinyurl.com/3pnj44s (James Watson) Myths,… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
However, in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) (16 June 2010), after a thorough review of the authorities, Tugendhat J held that the common law definition of “defamatory” must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims, both as a matter of precedent and to give effect to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Sibthorpe & Morris v LB Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 Champerty and maintenance are two common law doctrines relating to the funding of civil claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
The webpage is titled, "CDCR's December 8, 2010 Response to ACLU Public Records Act Request: ACLU v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
In another recent decision, the court made plain that the definition of “defamatory” includes a “threshold of seriousness”: Thornton v Telegraph [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It has been reported that despite her reverse before Mr Justice Tugendhat, Dr Sarah Thornton is to continue her libel action against the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
In a reserved judgment handed down today in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)) Mr Justice Tugendhat granted summary judgment to the defendant in respect of libel claims arising out of a review of the claimant’s book “Seven Days in the Art World” by Lynn Barber in the “Daily Telegraph” on 1 November 2008. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
According to Managing Editor Bill Akass his paper turned down the Lord Triesman story. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
Having turned down offers of £5,000 and £10,000 the claimant had to pay the costs of the compensation hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Thornton. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:54 am
Thornton (1995). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Thornton (1995) -- rejected state imposition of term limits on members of Congress, holding that the Constitution prohibits states from adopting congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated in the Constitution.Clinton v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Justice Scalia’s 2004 concurrence in Thornton v. [read post]
