Search for: "Daily v. Scott*" Results 121 - 140 of 767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Hayden Center for Intelligence, Policy and International Security at George Mason University covering the historical challenges of constructing the president’s daily intelligence brief. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:14 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Supreme Court addressed the EEOC’s methods in the 2015 case Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
My colleague Scott Hodge recently pointed to Tax Foundation research from 1950 that shows how harmful those policies are.[20] The real challenge of any excess profits tax, and one that Christians recently noted in a presentation, is defining what is excessive.[21] As U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
The result has been daily affronts to the values we used to take as given–that the president would try to represent all of his/her constituents, not just his “base”; that the president would actually try to comply with the law, not view it as optional; that the president and other government employees would not repeatedly and brazenly engage in self-dealing, grifting, and looting of the public treasury; that the president would not fire other members of the government to… [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Daily Signal, Elyssa Koren asserts that the court’s decision in USAID v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09437-19 Shipsey v Bournemouth Echo, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 6 Children (2019), No breach – after investigation 02972-20 Various v The Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 01828-20 Coates v bucksfreepress.co.uk, 5 Reporting suicide (2019), No breach – after investigation 00120-20 Moses… [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06584-20 Fair Play for Women v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 02638-20 A woman v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 6 Children (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved0 IPSO mediation 01321-20 A Man v Sunday Life, 11 Victims of sexual assault… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:47 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the 2002 case University of Great Falls v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Employers should be aware that reductions in salary or wage rate for exempt employees below the applicable state or federal minimum for exempt classification[iii] will result in reclassification of those individuals as hourly employees who are entitled to overtime for hours worked in excess of 40 per week (or on a daily basis, if required locally). [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]