Search for: "Daimler AG" Results 121 - 140 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2016, 4:54 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
What do BMW, Daimler AG, Fiat, Ford, GM, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Saab, Subaru, Tata Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen have in common? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:54 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
What do BMW, Daimler AG, Fiat, Ford, GM, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Saab, Subaru, Tata Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen have in common? [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:11 pm
”” [at [57], referring to Daimler, at [39]; my own translation from Italian] According to the AG, if it was confirmed that indeed the Amazon group companies had provided these services (or, at least, the most important ones), then the conclusion would be that – indeed – the behaviour falls within the scope of application of Article 9(3)(b) EUTMR.Importantly (and correctly), the AG also confirmed that, in the event that Amazon was found directly… [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:49 pm
The IPKat noted here the decision of Mr Justice Arnold last May in L'Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 3:30 pm by Kevin Hara
Last year, the Supreme Court sent a resounding message regarding personal jurisdiction when it decided Daimler AG v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:58 am by Simon Lester
The U.S. units of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Daimler AG will face duties of 2 percent and 2.7 percent respectively, it said. [read post]
11 May 2009, 7:23 am
The Defendant moved for summary judgment claiming that it had never manufactured or sold Mercedes-Benz vehicles and that Daimler-Benz AG manufactured the car and DaimlerChrysler AG, a German company, was the successor in interest to Daimler-Benz AG. [read post]
11 May 2009, 7:23 am
The Defendant moved for summary judgment claiming that it had never manufactured or sold Mercedes-Benz vehicles and that Daimler-Benz AG manufactured the car and DaimlerChrysler AG, a German company, was the successor in interest to Daimler-Benz AG. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:10 am by Nietzer
Hier das höchstrichterliche US-Urteil: Urteil Daimler AG v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  First, it argued the subpoena sought documents that were in the possession, custody and control of its parent company in Germany, Daimler AG, and that MBUSA had no right to demand the documents of Daimler, nor did it have any reason to request the documents in the ordinary course of business. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:01 am by Bill
Our hospitality practice frequently involves case in which the plaintiff was injured while on vacation, and until Daimler AG v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 2:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
”, the recent United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Daimler AG v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]