Search for: "Dave Hoffman" Results 121 - 140 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2011, 3:02 am by SHG
  Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions writes: Overconfident display encourages people to take polarized views of law, to distrust the good faith of the Court and of legal institutions, and to experience the malady of cognitive illiberalism. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:45 am
Rees, directed at Justice Stevens's concurrence in the same case, attracted praise at the Volokh Conspiracy (and from Dave Hoffman here) last week. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:13 am
Dave Hoffman notes that the Justice Department has filed an interesting amicus brief in Padilla v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:38 am
Over at Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman announces: Concurring Opinions, like A.I.G. and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac before it, is now too big too fail. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:13 pm
Dave Hoffman at CoOp reports on the Amended Complaint in the AutoAdmit lawsuit, filed last Thursday, with links to the new complaint and to some early commentary. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 12:41 am
This has already made its way around the internet, but just landed on my screen courtesy of Dave Hoffman at Co-Op. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:41 am
Dave Hoffman at CoOp gives my paper on video evidence a nice shout-out (thanks, Dave). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
Dave Hoffman's very interesting post below on the future of corporate law scholarship - as to which I posted a comment about "narrative" - got me to thinking about the reality of what goes on in a very complex corporate life, and academic attempts to distill that reality into meaningful scholarship. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 5:33 am
I want to start by thanking Christine, Gordon, and the rest of the ‘Glom gang for inviting me to participate as a commentator on Darian Ibrahim's terrific paper, The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investing. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:11 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Yesterday, Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions characterized my cobloggers and me as  ”engaging in victory lap devoted to the proposition ‘We were right and you were wrong, and the fact that you didn’t predict our being right demonstrates that you are particularly close-minded. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at CoOp, Dave Hoffman has more on the relative importance of the facts in Perry: [T]here are facts, and then there are constitutional facts. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 6:18 am
I read this post by Dave Hoffman at Co-Op a few days ago, and it's bothered me since. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:08 pm
In case you didn't see it, Dave Hoffman at Co-Op wrote something about the site a while back and has been maintaining his interest. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:44 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Before responding to Dave, let me say that this post contains a lot of references to, and ultimately critiques of, Dave’s thoughts. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
This paper, which just appeared in the SSRN Empirical & Experimental Journal, sheds some light on the cultural components of reasonableness in Supreme Court jurisprudence: Dan Kahan (Yale), Dave Hoffman (Temple), and Donald Braman (GWU Law), "Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 12:59 pm
A big thank-you to Dave Hoffman and the Concurring Opinions bloggers for inviting me for a guest stint. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:21 am by Dan Markel
Jack Balkin, Danielle Citron, Orin Kerr, Kim Krawiec, Frank Pasquale, Gordon Smith, Al Brophy, Christine Hurt, Sandy Levinson, Mary Dudziak, and Dave Hoffman have all agreed to give up their perches for the month and join us at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 12:30 pm
Obviously there was some back and forth in the blogosphere yesterday about Jeff Skilling's sentence:  Dave Hoffman (see my comments there); Larry Ribstein (responding to Dave); Ellen Podgor and Peter Henning; and Geoff Manne (with the best title). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Brishen Rogers
First off, a big thanks to my colleague Dave Hoffman and the other editors for the invitation to guest blog this month. [read post]