Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 121 - 140
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
On 5 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hamblin v News Group Newspapers Limited before Nicklin J On 6 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley Lennon before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Marshall discussed the sale of genuine goods with the barcoded data removed constituted a trade mark infringement in the US, reviewing Davidoff's successful COOL WATER action against CVS (here) and the bizarre manner of its expression.Dr Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) then examined the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Court C-57/08 COPAD v Dior. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Richard observes that these comments are made all the more relevant by the recent Kat-rant over the pathetically short time available for consultation in Actavis v Sanofi, a reference to the CJEU in which, this Kat believes, a good case could be made out for a more generous time allowance given the political and economic significance of the case's outcome. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
This puzzling question landed on the CJEU's desk late last month, which sets an interesting precedent for future infringement cases.The case of Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Limited v Duma Forklifts NV concerns the sale of Mitsubishi forklifts, for which Mitsubishi's European arm has the exclusive rights to. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:16 am
This puzzling question landed on the CJEU's desk late last month, which sets an interesting precedent for future infringement cases.The case of Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Limited v Duma Forklifts NV concerns the sale of Mitsubishi forklifts, for which Mitsubishi's European arm has the exclusive rights to. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:43 am
His Honour Judge Hacon has handed down a short but sweet judgment in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) claim of Nomination di Antonio e Paolo Gensini SNC and Anor v Sebastian Brealey and Victoria Brealey (t/a JSC Jewellery) [2019] EWHC 599 (IPEC). [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:25 am
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:32 pm
In Galaviz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:25 am
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2023, there was a hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Davidoff and others v Brown QB-2020-002760. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Then, in his "M&A Law Prof Blog," Professor Steven Davidoff posted six reasons why he doesn't necessarily agree with Kevin's analysis (the NY Times' DealBook has picked up on this debate). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:58 pm
The case is Moskal v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:21 pm
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm
This shift is largely the result of two Delaware court decisions, the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:21 am
" Mercier v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
IPSO – 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation – 10225-21 A man and a woman v Ardrossan & Saltcoats Herald, 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation – 11065-21 Keenan v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication… [read post]
