Search for: "Delay v. Texas"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Also Art. 22 requirement to ensure that notices submitted by trusted flaggers w/in their designated area of expertise, should be processed w/o undue delay. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:15 am
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997) and Ortiz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
In Dep't of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm
On March 15, a federal district court in Texas heard arguments in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Medicinal abortions are the most common form of abortion in the US, and after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:19 am
Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee who has written critically about Roe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm
Nine years after Brown’s trial, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 2:48 pm
” The CCA answered this question in the negative on February 15, 2023, in Edwards v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
But the claim was false; a simple delay in Pennsylvania’s election site to update explained the discrepancy in reported public votes cast. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
If passed, Texas will become the sixth state to enact major privacy legislation. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
” A Texas judge ruled last week that Balentine’s execution should be delayed because his lawyers were not properly notified of the execution date. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
Just last month, Texas Gov. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:24 am
Texas January 18, 2023). [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The final rules were originally expected as early as October 2022 but have been delayed, with SEC speakers declining to discuss the scope and timing of the final rules in recent remarks. [read post]