Search for: "Department of Justice v. Julian"
Results 121 - 140
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 9:05 pm
They also classify the Department of Justice as a leading agency because it has the highest number of agencies that copied its regulations. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
Judge Kozinski devoted most of his remarks to poking fun at the Justice Department’s theory of the case in Syufy. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Department of Justice argues that Bolton published classified information in his memoir, “The Room Where It Happened. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Press Gazette and Guardian describe the naming of Marandi as a victory for open justice. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The new legal term begins with the swearing in of the new head of the judiciary, the Lady Chief Justice, Lady Carr. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
European stem cells Last week the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a judgment in the case of Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V (Case C? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm
Julian Ku discussed the implications of the U.K. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am
Late last week, CNN reported that the Justice Department is close to bringing criminal charges against Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks and a longtime resident of the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am
Julian Ku provided his take. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Shayler [2002] UKHL 11, [2003] 1 AC 247, at para. 113, citing with approval Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
As noted by Braiden and Brockman, whether or not the Department of Justice officials are partial or impartial in their decisions, it is imperative that justice appears to have been achieved. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Cass, Motive And Opportunity: Courts’ Intrusions Into Discretionary Decisions Of Other Branches–A Comment On Department Of Commerce V. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
The claim form and particulars of claim can be found on Lawtel [£] Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
In a judgment handed down on the last day of term (Vardy v Rooney [2022] EQHC 2017 (QB)) Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed Rebekah Vardy’s libel claim against Coleen Rooney. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Mr Justice Mann ruled that the claim relating to allegations about what the legal department knew could be aired at a trial. [read post]