Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. A." Results 121 - 140 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, Dalley establishes that [**11] Harris failed to make any evidentiary showing that the alleged conduct caused any mental or physical symptom or injury that would indicate the existence of severe emotional distress (see Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 612 N.E.2d 699, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350, supra; see also Elbogen v Esikoff, 266 AD2d 15, 697 N.Y.S.2d 614 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
 Many if not most homeowners insure their homes under insurance policies that utilize as their main policy form the Insurance Services Office's copyrighted HO-3 endorsement. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. of Child Services - "However, we conclude that the trial court's findings do not support the judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
” Hillingdon housing dept then refused the application, quoting the medical advisor’s report and adding Further your landlord… was contacted on 13th July. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm by Guest Blogger
Moriarty, 106 F. 886, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1901)[2] 13 USC §195[3]Dept. of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Dept. of Professional Regulation, 596 So.2d 450, 452 (Fla. 1992) (“Attorney’s fees incurred while prosecuting or defending a claim are not recoverable in the absence of a statute or contractual agreement authorizing their recovery. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
North Carolina Dept. of Health and Human Services, The Court held that when a party awarded a CON completes the construction of the facility and it becomes fully operational, an appeal challenging the award of the CON is moot. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:33 am by Viking
Denver Dept. of Human Services, the trial court sustained an objection to a late “notice” on both notice and 403 grounds. [read post]