Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. S." Results 121 - 140 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
” Hillingdon housing dept then refused the application, quoting the medical advisor’s report and adding Further your landlord… was contacted on 13th July. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
Employer has the burden of proof that a disability prevents the employee from reasonably performing the functions and duties of the position Matter of New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 57 AD3d 1057 New York State Correction Officer Edward J. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:31 pm
West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001), or under Board precedent prior to Buckhannon, and it was on this basis that the Board adopted the judge's recommended Order and dismissed the EAJA application. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
 Many if not most homeowners insure their homes under insurance policies that utilize as their main policy form the Insurance Services Office's copyrighted HO-3 endorsement. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, Dalley establishes that [**11] Harris failed to make any evidentiary showing that the alleged conduct caused any mental or physical symptom or injury that would indicate the existence of severe emotional distress (see Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 612 N.E.2d 699, 596 N.Y.S.2d 350, supra; see also Elbogen v Esikoff, 266 AD2d 15, 697 N.Y.S.2d 614 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. of Child Services - "However, we conclude that the trial court's findings do not support the judgment. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:30 pm by Ilya Somin
US Dept. of Health and Human Services, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a trial court decision refusing to issue a preliminary injunction against the Centers for Disease Control nationwide eviction moratorium. [read post]