Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. S." Results 121 - 140 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Third, the EIR’s section of a baseline for assessing the cumulative impacts of the project’s greenhouse gas emissions was inappropriate. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nov. 7, 2013) Shutterstock / lineartestpilot “cartoon complaining man” Plaintiff Jennifer Shepherd was a child protective services (CPS) caseworker for the Oregon Dept. of Human Services (DHS). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act, placement)Citizens for Balanced Use v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Stevens v Ark Dept of Human Services An excerpt: Even though the child’s father had not produced the ordered evidence of eligibility for Choctaw membership, the trial court utilized the higher evidentiary standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which is required under the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Dept. of Health and Human Services, (7th Cir., Jan. 29, 2013), Judge Rendell in her majority opinion concluded that the Mennonite owners of a wood specialties manufacturing company had failed to show a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of their free exercise, RFRA or Establishment Clause claims. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm by Venkat
” A fire dept. employee, an emergency medical services supervisor, photographs the computer screen, including the complaint, along with the caller’s name, address, and telephone number. [read post]