Search for: "DirecTV" Results 121 - 140 of 924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2007, 1:53 pm
I'm happy to report that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in support of our argument in the DirecTV v. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
DirecTV, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Sept. 18, 2006), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight) affirmed the trial court's order denying the defendant's motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiff's CLRA and UCL class claims, holding that the no-class-action arbitration provision was unconscionable under Discover Bank v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:05 pm
DirecTV, 06-CV-14245 (SDNY Feb 5, 2007) (Swain, J). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
Which is all they could allege because, not surprisingly, there was nothing in the standard (DIRECTV-drafted) contract that obligated DIRECTV to do what it advertised.You'd think this was a pretty straightforward class action. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:14 am by Jon Brodkin
AT&T purchased DirecTV in July 2015 and in September of this year started exempting DirecTV's online streaming from the data caps. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:23 am by Jon Brodkin
Aurich Lawson AT&T this week filed a "public interest" statement with US regulators describing the benefits of its proposed $48.5 billion acquisition of DirecTV. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:44 am by Dimitrije Canic
DirecTV, LLC, further exploring the issue of when class actions achieve Article III standing. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 9:45 am by Stacey Lantagne
Revitch was a wireless customer of AT&T, so DirecTV moved to compel arbitration under its sibling corporation's wireless... [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:59 pm
Class Action Challenging Monthly Fees Imposed by Satellite TV Provider not Subject to Arbitration on Individual Basis because Class Action Waiver in Arbitration Provision was Unenforceable Georgia Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action in a Georgia federal court against his satellite television provider, DirecTV, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment, and seeking an accounting as well as injunctive and declaratory; specifically, the class action complaint… [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
(reference): DirecTV Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:56 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Yang As discussed by our Consumer Class Defense Blog, this week’s Supreme Court decision in DirecTV, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:30 am by Steve Brachmann
Patent No. 9124933, entitled Method and System for Detecting Unauthorized Use of a Set Top Box Using Expected Terrestrial Signal Identification, originally a DirecTV patent which became AT&T’s property after its merger. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 9:58 am
For unparalleled clarity, you need DIRECTV HD. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:18 am by The Docket Navigator
" "[Plaintiff] reasons that DirecTV put the system into service because (i) DirecTV owns the telephone number required to access the system, (2) the system is designed to serve DirecTV's customers, (3) the system accesses DirecTV's backend accounting system for customer data and movie titles, and (4) DirecTV owns a website. . . . [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by Jon Brodkin
Yet it seems the two are intertwined: AT&T told the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday that it needs approval of the DirecTV merger in order to bring fiber to 2 million locations. [read post]