Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 121 - 140 of 3,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 2:00 am by Taras Rudnitsky
Plaintiff: Galaxy Portfolio LLC / Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC Original Creditor: Direct Merchant Bank, N.A. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:48 am by Stephen Bilkis
In 1976 plaintiff and defendant formed another closely held corporation, 91 Graham Avenue Realty Corporation, which purchased a parcel of land in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:48 am by Stephen Bilkis
In 1976 plaintiff and defendant formed another closely held corporation, 91 Graham Avenue Realty Corporation, which purchased a parcel of land in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:48 am by Stephen Bilkis
In 1976 plaintiff and defendant formed another closely held corporation, 91 Graham Avenue Realty Corporation, which purchased a parcel of land in Brooklyn. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:04 pm
Therefore, the plaintiffs could only assert whatever individual, direct claims survived the bankruptcy. [read post]
29 May 2023, 1:26 pm
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP SCOTUS Holds That Direct-Listing Plaintiff Must Plead and Prove Purchase of Shares Traceable To Defective Registration StatementSLACK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, f/k/a SLACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
By James DeGiulio -- Drug Wholesalers Secure Injunction Blocking Braintree from Terminating MiraLAX Supply Direct purchasers of MiraLAX, who have brought a class action suit headed by Rochester Drug Cooperative ("RDC") against drugmaker Braintree Laboratories Inc., were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction blocking Braintree from terminating its sales to the drug wholesaler plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
"   The plaintiffs’ response, Judge Marrero noted, "went far beyond the limited direction of scope the court’s direction. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:04 am by Docket Navigator
On the Amazon.com storefront, customers could purchase the allegedly infringing products and have them shipped to them. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:47 am by randal shaheen
The plaintiffs claimed that they lost business as the result of FNC’s misrepresentations because FNC was able to build a competing electronic database that lending institutions could choose in lieu of purchasing appraisal services from the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:47 am by Julie Lam
  The trial court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claim against QFD, a mobile home dealer, for rescission of the purchase agreement and damages. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
Defendant did not sell the contraceptives directly to plaintiff, and plaintiff admitted that she did not purchase the contraceptives from defendant, but rather from a pharmacy.Id. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:02 pm
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), the Supreme Court held that only plaintiffs that purchased a product directly from a co-conspirator can recover treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act for a violation of the antitrust laws. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  He lost those claims.He testified that he wanted to enter direct competition with Nautilus, but because of the patent statements, he thought he needed a license. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Two of the three packages in the complaint have dagger footnotes by “flushable” directing consumers to the side panel:  A long list of "do not flush" instructions directing consumers, among other things, to consult "local rules" and not flush if "you are unsure of system capability"Plaintiffs alleged that they relied on the front label and did not read the side panel disclaimer before purchasing. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:26 am
Cushman ("The plaintiff thereafter brought the present actions, alleging entitlement to specific performance of the options to purchase the realty. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:47 am by structuredsettlements
 Comments:A plausible argument that has been made but never proven to have a direct connection.CONCLUSION:There are many reasons for plaintiff and plaintiff attorneys to retain their own structured settlement planner. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by John Jascob
But the court explained that the case law directs courts to look at the substance of transactions rather than to their form in determining whether a purchase or sale has occurred. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Until a recent Ninth Circuit decision, plaintiffs were typically required to prove purchase of registered shares in order to assert these claims. [read post]