Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board" Results 121 - 140 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
While municipalities typically have only employees in the classified service to consider when making layoff decisions, BOCES and school districts have staffs consisting of both employees in the unclassified service and employees in the classified service. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 11:25 am by James Hamilton
SEC, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 10-1305, Nov. 30, 2010.Armed with specific congressional authorization, the SEC adopted shareholder proxy access, Rule 14a-11, which is shorthand for a regulatory framework under which a shareholder may require the company to include in its proxy statement and proxy card a person nominated by the shareholder, and not by the board, for election to the board. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
 That policy that underlies the doctrine might arguably be thought to extend with equal felicity to subcontracts under government prime contracts, but – until UPMC-Braddock – we were aware of no Board of Contract Appeals or court that has so held. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:16 am by Sheppard Mullin
 That policy that underlies the doctrine might arguably be thought to extend with equal felicity to subcontracts under government prime contracts, but – until UPMC-Braddock – we were aware of no Board of Contract Appeals or court that has so held. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by James Hamilton
The sheer volume of these contracts overwhelmed some firms that had promised to provide payment on the credit default swaps and left institutions with losses that they believed they had been protected against. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am by Eric Turkewitz
District Court for the District of Columbia to compel release of the transcripts and to prevent redaction. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(Michael Geist) Proposed practice notices: Professional designations and abbreviations, acronyms and initials: College of Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners and Acupuncturists of British Columbia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
NGO objects to APEDA’s requirements (Spicy IP) Liberalisation of foreign technology agreement policy (Spicy IP) Copyright Board: Need for speed? [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law Free With Registration: Nurse Not a "Persecutor" Under Immigration Law for Working at Hospital That Performed Forced Abortions NEW YORK COUNTYContracts Breach of Contract Cause of Action Against Insurance Company Survives Dismissal Forman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
     The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in a split decision, reversed. [read post]