Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 121 - 140
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Public Works, 257 A.D.2d 972, the Appellate Division upheld the employer imposing a greater penalty that the one recommended by the hearing officer as there was ample evidence in the record to support the employer’s decision.In short, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the employer on the fairness of penalties, but will do so if the penalty appears grossly unfair -- the standard established in Pell v Board of Education, 34… [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:35 pm
Our New Jersey Appellate Division recently addressed this very issue in Delanoy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
1930 Amendment to Permit Employer to Change Treating Doctor What other principles have been forgotten which might be of use to employers? [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Public Works, 257 A.D.2d 972, the Appellate Division upheld the employer imposing a greater penalty that the one recommended by the hearing officer as there was ample evidence in the record to support the employer’s decision.In short, courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the employer on the fairness of penalties, but will do so if the penalty appears grossly unfair -- the standard established in Pell v Board of Education, 34… [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:46 am
The style of the case is, Williams v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
He escaped before the truck exploded and sustained some injuries, albeit minor.IMSS paid Valenzuela for his lost daily wages and covered the cost of his medical care from doctors within its network of providers.But, in September 2010, Valenzuela filed an injury report with the Arizona Industrial Commission naming Porteadores as his employer. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 6:26 am
The court in Golden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:43 am
Continue to Follow Your Doctor’s Advice It is important that you continue following your doctor’s advice at home as well. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:43 am
Continue to Follow Your Doctor’s Advice It is important that you continue following your doctor’s advice at home as well. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:54 am
The government complaint said at least 36 physicians had employment contracts tied to the business they brought to the hospital. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
In a brief opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
It is invoked by nurses, midwives, doctors, pharmacists and others. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
But going back to work is possible, and many employers are glad to have the experience, perspective, and work ethic that younger workers are often missing. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
The DOLs Wage and Hour Division issued six new opinion letters August 28, which include: 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
The Court reviews Squeo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:19 am
The Supreme Court had previously in Karlin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
The fund denied the doctor's request on the basis that the doctor had not demonstrated the medical necessity of the extra treatments.A workers' compensation law judge upheld the fund's decision, as did the Workers' Compensation Board. [read post]
