Search for: "Doe 2"
Results 121 - 140
of 146,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2024, 6:08 am
These conflicts do not fit easily into the definitions of international armed conflict (IAC) and non-international armed conflict (NIAC) under common articles 2 and 3 of the Geneva Conventions. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, simply filing an application for benefits, selecting a retirement date and abstaining from performing services for the employer on the effective date thereof does not constitute a legitimate retirement — particularly where, as here, the applicant in question remains on the employer's payroll and subsequently continues to perform services for the employer. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, simply filing an application for benefits, selecting a retirement date and abstaining from performing services for the employer on the effective date thereof does not constitute a legitimate retirement — particularly where, as here, the applicant in question remains on the employer's payroll and subsequently continues to perform services for the employer. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
" [2.] [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Four DSGs argued cases: Malcolm Stewart (3), Edwin Kneedler (2), Eric Feigin (2), and Curtis Gannon (2). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
Detailed instructions will be provided by the Department of State by August 2, 2024. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
This does not apply to a licensed attorney giving legal advice to a client. 718.112(r)(1), Florida Statutes and 718.112(r)(2), Florida Statutes Establishes additional director or officer offenses, including charges or indictment with specific crimes, that result in the removal of the officer or director from office. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm
The two-part test merely asks (1) whether there is reasonable cause to believe an unfair labor practice has occurred and (2) whether injunctive relief is just and proper. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:48 am
It is a violation if a covered person does either of the following: Advertises a rate for the lodging, which does not include all mandatory fees, except taxes and government charges. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
Finchem's amended VSEC asserted (1) misconduct and (2) illegal votes…. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am
" The Advertising Provision does not explicitly define what it means for an advertisement to be misleading. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
And, trademark-specific question, does that mean that trademark infringement claims are also not worrisome, or does the difference between denying the benefits of registration and the full suppression/punishment of infringement (and sign ordinances) matter? [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
§ 2(b)(2). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
The court sidesteps this defense on Twitter’s motion to dismiss because of 230(c)(2)(A)’s good faith requirement. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:54 am
The other 2 were New Zealand and "safari. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Moreover, the complaint sufficiently alleges facts that impute liability on DOE for failing to take immediate and appropriate corrective action after being notified of LaFia's conduct (see Administrative Code § 8-107[13][b]; see Doe v Bloomberg, L.P., 36 NY3d 450, 454-455 [2021]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Moreover, the complaint sufficiently alleges facts that impute liability on DOE for failing to take immediate and appropriate corrective action after being notified of LaFia's conduct (see Administrative Code § 8-107[13][b]; see Doe v Bloomberg, L.P., 36 NY3d 450, 454-455 [2021]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:41 am
It does not matter what day or time it is, Shimon gets back to you. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
And even when an interesting business divorce issue does make its way up to Albany, it’s even more rare to see the Court of Appeals, in a case of first impression, fashion a new framework for addressing a complex question. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
The district court relied on the provision of Section 1071(b)(2) of the Act that shields the Director of the USPTO from being named a party to an inter partes proceeding. [read post]
