Search for: "Doe Defendant 5" Results 121 - 140 of 22,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 8:16 am by scanner1
.; BURNS AUCTION & APPRAISAL, LLC; and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:14 am
Pseudonymous defendant, AK47, had his motion to quash heard on Monday, May 5. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:38 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The court held that an insurance clause may create an obligation to pay damages equal to defence costs, but it does not create a duty to defend. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:59 am by The Docket Navigator
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, 2-12-cv-00802 (PAED April 5, 2012, Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:19 am by Jonathan Holbrook
App. 726 (2007), the court held that “when a defendant admits to willfully violating a condition of his or her probation in court, the State does not need to present evidence to support the violations. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
Everett Flannery, in his capacity as Kennebec County Sheriff, was later added as a defendant. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
The Third Circuit was unpersuaded, noting that "the mere fact that a defendant may not survive beyond his sentence does not provide a basis for a shorter sentence," --- at least not in the court of appeals, under the deferential review accorded sentences post-Booker. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
  Before the passage of the deadline for Gomez to file for class certification, Campbell offered Gomez the total amount of personal treble damages that he could recover if the lawsuit succeeded.[5]  Campbell did not offer to pay attorney’s fees, because the TCPA does not provide for recovery of those fees. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:47 am
The grounds: that "the proposed Order (1) purports to grant the Court jurisdiction it does not have, and (2) unfairly and improperly prejudices [defendants]. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am by SHG
Why not call the plaintiff “Victim Sue” and the defendant “Evil Joe”? [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:14 am by Docket Navigator
§ 355(j)(5)(B)(iii) that a party has failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the litigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
This instruction does not come into play when the defendant admits he/she took the property, but, perhaps, defends the case by saying he/she had a right to take it. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm by Steve Lash
A judge’s failure to ask prospective jurors if they respect a criminal defendant’s constitutional right not to testify is generally rendered harmless if the defendant does in fact take the stand at trial, a divided Maryland high court ruled this week. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:00 am by Luke Salzwedel
To adequately state a claim under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and successfully implement Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to show: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation. [read post]