Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 through 20" Results 121 - 140 of 4,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 5:22 am by Terry Hart
The issue: “(1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
The post Quick Links From the Past Year, Part 1 (CCPA and Privacy) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:03 pm by Camilla Hrdy
Compare: one court orders a 20-year worldwide injunction...while another court orders the defendant to cease selling products but allows defendant, after only 90 days, to start selling products defendant creates in a “clean room” not using plaintiff’s trade secrets. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:26 pm by Robert C. Weill
 Question certified: Does the limitation in section 766.31(1)(b)1., Florida Statutes, of a single award of $100,000 to both parents violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Florida Constitutions? [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:10 am by Jessica Smith
When I ask this question of North Carolina stakeholders, most guess that the percentage of defendants who appear in court at risk level 1 is about 50% and that the percentage who appear at risk level 6 is about 20%. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Allstate additionally conducted internet searches and, through these various searches, located a street address for the particular Defendant at issue. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:19 pm by Skier & Associates
  A third or subsequent conviction under subsection (a) is a Class C felony and the possible sentence is 1 year and 1 day to 10 years. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:19 pm by Skier & Associates
  A third or subsequent conviction under subsection (a) is a Class C felony and the possible sentence is 1 year and 1 day to 10 years. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Evan Brown
“Our encounters with Article 1, Section 9 have always involved words, thus invoking the ‘right to speak’ clause. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
I would guesstimate (and NORML confirms) that at least 1/2 of the possession cases involve defendants under 25. [read post]