Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-20" Results 121 - 140 of 8,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Defendant stabbed the medical technician several times in the chest, inflicting two puncture holes in his shirt and a 1-1 1/2 inch slash of his bulletproof vest. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:22 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Does 1 – 171, arguing that joining all the defendants in one action violated Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:03 am by Jon Sands
Juvenile Male, No.11-30065 (1-20-12)(McKeown with Guy and Tallman).The issue of "Who is an Indian" is raised in this juvenile matter. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
United States, 22-5345Issues: (1) Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge for which the defendant was acquitted by a jury; and (2) whether it violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment for the district court to sentence Gary Karr based on a 20-year-old, out-of-court statement, never subjected to cross-examination, made by the more-culpable but… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:26 am by Miller & Falkner
The jury in this case decided that only 20 percent of the negligence by Heartland of Charleston was medical, so only $1 million of the entire award was subject to the cap. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:53 pm by Neal S. Gainsberg
  The post How Does a Wrongful Death Lawsuit Differ from a Personal Injury Lawsuit? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm by Jamie Markham
For now, suffice it to say that officers, prosecutors, judicial officials, and defendants dealing with G.S. 14-208.18 after September 1 will want to keep a careful eye on the Doe case as it moves forward, to be sure they are applying the proper version of the law. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm by Jamie Markham
For now, suffice it to say that officers, prosecutors, judicial officials, and defendants dealing with G.S. 14-208.18 after September 1 will want to keep a careful eye on the Doe case as it moves forward, to be sure they are applying the proper version of the law. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 11:59 pm by Kevin
See, e.g., “Disgraced Lawyer’s Crocodile Shoes Sold for $1062” (Sept. 20, 2022). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:24 pm
The defendant moved to suppress, (1) certain statements he made which he claimed were involuntary within the meaning of CPL 60.45 and (2) the results of the defendant's blood test. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:24 pm
The defendant moved to suppress, (1) certain statements he made which he claimed were involuntary within the meaning of CPL 60.45 and (2) the results of the defendant's blood test. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:52 am
Esparza, No. 07-50293 (1-20-09). [read post]
The defendants then argued that spouses should be included in assessing CAFA’s numerosity requirement based on the Louisiana’s community property regime – Louisiana Civil Law Treaties: Matrimonial Regimes § 1:1 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
  UPDATE: Following my initial publication of this post, a loyal reader provided me with a copy of the January 20, 2012 Amended and Restated Complaint [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:46 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Arizona Appeals Court Ruling – Case #1 (No. 2 CA-CR 2014-0181) On July 20, 2015, the Arizona Court of Appeals Division Two issued the first ruling. [read post]