Search for: "Doe Governmental Entities 1-20" Results 121 - 140 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
 ___________BILL NUMBER: AB 2525 INTRODUCED BILL TEXTINTRODUCED BY Assembly Members Bonta and Levine FEBRUARY 21, 2014 An act to amend Sections 12311 and 25100 of, to amend the headingof Title 2.6 (commencing with Section 17701.01) of, to add theheading of Division 1 (commencing with Section 17701.01) to, and toadd Division 2 (commencing with Section 17801.01) to, Title 2.6 of,the Corporations Code, relating to worker cooperative companies. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consonant with the foregoing, it is the opinion of this Court that the City has failed to establish a right to governmental immunity in the instant matter (see Sean M. v City of New York, 20 AD3d at 160; Barnes v County of Nassau, 108 AD2d at 55). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:47 pm by Anna Stancu
The City and other governmental entities are not covered employers under the ordinance. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:25 am
"The paper was first presented at the International Seminar: Constitutionalization of the World-Power System, held 19 and 20 June 2014. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
So Heidi does the usual drill: Suggestion of Bankruptcy on the Record, Amendment to list Additional Creditor, and so on. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:10 am by Stephanie Kapinos
No. 1170 (the “Bill”) would amend Section 1, Chapter 5 of Title 20 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York and require businesses (but not governmental actors) to give notice to customers if they are collecting “biometric identifier information. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:14 am
 The remaining membership interests in New Chrysler would be issued to U.S. and Canadian governmental entities and a subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:14 am
 The remaining membership interests in New Chrysler would be issued to U.S. and Canadian governmental entities and a subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii)… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:12 am
  H-1B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries who will work at institutions of higher education or a related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or at nonprofit research organizations or governmental research organizations are exempt from the fiscal year cap. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
[the Mitigation Fee Act]), it does a good job of clarifying and respecting the limits of CEQA’s scope, underscoring that it does not provide a “cure all” remedy for all that ails governmental entities or other plaintiffs dissatisfied with a project. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
While the main concerns of the international system formed before the era of globalization were war and diplomacy among sovereign States, dealing with non-governmental entities in this context is one of the challenges of the globalized world. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
Introductory Note )Throughout the week starting 20 June 2022, the co-editors will post written contributions on the homepage of the Symposium in the following order:--Monday: Introduction by co-editors Justine Batura (Twitter: @JustineBatura), Anna Sophia Tiedeke & Michael Riegner (Twitter: @riegnerm)--Monday, 1 pm: Giulia Botta--Tuesday, 8 am: Jonathan Klaaren (Twitter: @JonathanKlaaren)--Tuesday, 1 pm: Lucas Roorda (Twitter: @LRoordaLaw)--Wednesday, 8 am: Claire… [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
     The United States Trustee’s Handbook for Standing Chapter 13 Trustees (10/1/12) states that the Chapter 13 must monitor the debtor and his or her business to “verify that the ongoing business, while in bankruptcy, does not fall in deeper financial difficulty than at the time of the filing of the case. [read post]