Search for: "Doe Installers No. 1-10" Results 121 - 140 of 2,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
The limit for the non-business energy property credits has a lifetime cap of $500 if you have received a tax credit since January 1, 2005. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 as granted read :1. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
VirginiaDocket: 10-1498Issue(s): (1) Whether Padilla v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
In addition, for certain DUIs, suspensions are being reduced and initial jail time is being reduced Below is an outline of the new DUI Laws that begin January 1, 2011:   1. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
 (6) The department shall monitor the installation and maintenance of the ignition interlock device installed pursuant to paragraph (1). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:38 am by kbwoodspr
Also in 2010, the 10 megawatt Exelon City Solar installation, which is the largest urban solar power plant in the United States, was built on a brownfield site in Chicago. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:08 pm by rquintilone
Effective January 1, 2013, AB 2674 makes the following changes to Labor Code § 1198.5: 1. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm by ADeStefano
The Vineyards of Fredonia, LLC that Labor Law § 240(1) does not apply where a construction worker on stilts slipped on ice and fell to the floor. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
Because I’m busy preparing for argument, today’s installment will be brief. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:00 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
There, the CJEU held that – while the mere provision of physical facilities does not as such amount to communication to the public in accordance with recital 27 – the installation of such facilities and the distribution of a signal by means of television sets by a hotel to customers staying in its rooms, whatever technique is used to transmit the signal, does constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:54 pm
The IPKat seems to somehow have missed the latest installment in the series "is Lundbeck's escitalopram patent valid? [read post]