Search for: "Doe et al v. Obama et al" Results 121 - 140 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by John Elwood
§  Petitioners’ reply §  Amicus brief of Economists et al. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
§  Amicus brief of International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
The United States National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed by President Obama in March 2010. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
The Hill: “Businesses have a responsibility, too,” said Obama in his weekly address on Saturday. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Their petition (Cao, et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Khouli et al., and resulted in the repatriation of artifacts to Egypt during the MoU signing ceremony this week, including a mummy's hand.Cultural objects covered by the new MoU's import restrictions may legally pass through America's borders when accompanied by either an export permit or proof showing that the artifacts left Egypt before the adoption of US import regulations. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Lyle Denniston
   That was the result the Court overturned in Sackett, et al., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
NFL, et al (08-661) case (argument date unscheduled), which will test whether the National Football League's exclusive apparel licensing deal with Reebok violates antitrust rules. [read post]