Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 121 - 140 of 550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am by James Segroves
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:54 am by Ronald Mann
It is plain from the briefing that the great majority of those judges are in the Social Security Administration, though a substantial number of ALJs are scattered throughout other departments. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm by Monique Altheim
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, before any income is required to be applied to the person's cost of care, [certain] deductions will be made" On the instant appeal, petitioner contends that the transfer of Hammond's recurring Social Security retirement and pension income into the third-party SNT created for the benefit must be excluded from her NAMI for the purpose of calculating her own contribution towards her Medicaid post-eligibility benefits. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:25 am by Steven Cohen
 He now assists low-income clients on matters dealing with Social Security benefits. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
FEC Case Dissent from Dismissal Commissioners’ Statement of Reasons (May 6, 2021) Federal Election Commission, Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
McIntyre, UCD Sutherland School of Law Does the GDPR Have Trust Issues? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Exhibit 1 is a benefit verification letter from the Social Security Administration dated October 15, 2021, that verifies applicant’s entitlement to monthly disability benefits. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
  He also found that Magistrates Courts retain the power to adjourn further under s.54 of the 1980 Act, as Mr Justice Mitting found in Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis v Hooper (2005) EWHC 340 (Admin). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am by Adam Wagner
The real question was of “necessity, pressing social need and proportionality“. [read post]