Search for: "Doe v. General Hospital of District of Columbia"
Results 121 - 140
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
The plaintiffs have appealed to the California Court of Appeal Columbia Physical Therapy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
May 13, 2011) (applied to pharmacists); Springhill Hospitals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Neither does it require, as the Solicitor General of Pu [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
., v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm
(Ilya Somin) The recent District of Columbia federal trial court decision upholding the individual mandate breaks little new ground and has many of the same weaknesses as the two previous district court decisions that went the same way. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
Appellants in these cases include individual cities and States, the National League of Cities, and the National Governors' Conference; [n7] they brought an action in the District [p837] Court for the District of Columbia which challenged the validity of the 1974 amendments. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Health Care Reform: DOCTOR-OWNED HOSPITALS URGE COURT TO STRIKE BAN ON NEW FACILITIES, Physician Hosps. of Am. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
It held, also unanimously, that the federal government’s racial segregation in the public schools of the District of Columbia violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
It held, also unanimously, that the federal government’s racial segregation in the public schools of the District of Columbia violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.Michigan Federal District Court: Plaintiff May Not Argue His Jones Act and General Maritime Law Claims Are His Only Avenue to Recovery; Defendants Did Not Demonstrate that a Broader Order Prohibiting the Use of the Phrases “One Day in Court” and “Workers Compensation” Was NecessaryIn Klump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:49 am
The District of Columbia does not, however, provide for grief claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:40 am
: Proposed amendments to Plant Variety Statute (IP Osgoode) EU: German Federal Supreme Court referral to ECJ concerning embryonic stem cells and the Biotech Directive (EPLAW) EU: Data exclusivity and food claims in Europe - Commission authorises health claim on the effect of water-soluble tomato concentrate on platelet aggregation and grants protection of proprietary data under Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 (IPKat) France: Pharma trade marks under threat - Senate and National Assembly approve law… [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
District Judge Jose Martinez sent pieces of the permit review back to the U.S. [read post]
