Search for: "Doe v. Harris"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2014, 3:47 pm
Harris v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The California Supreme Court currently has before it a petition for review in the case of Harris Ranch Inn & Restaurant v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
As a federal court's recent ruling in Harris v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm
Copyright precedent close to home for Prince Harry’s wife can be seen echoing in controversy decades ago over private letters belonging to Prince Harry’s mother. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I preview a case to be argued in the Supreme Court next week, Harris v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:06 am
Harris v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
[cites to Doe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
FLATHEAD COUNTY, BIGFORK LAND USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, FLATHEAD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, FLATHEAD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR JEFF HARRIS and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:07 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).According to the EEOC’s 2014 lawsuit, Harris discharged the late Aimee Stephens as funeral director because she announced she was transitioning from male to female (EEOC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
What does the standard mean? [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Does Copyright Doe Defendant Can’t Quash Disclosure Subpoena Anonymously—Hard Drive Productions v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:32 am
Marc Harris United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
After scrutinizing the United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
The holding does not apply to facts which trigger a minimum sentence within the allowed sentencing range and thats what Alleyne could change.Harris: A Lower Standard for Mandatory Minimum SentencesDeciding in Alleyne's favor would mean extending Apprendi, but also overruling a 2002 case which presented the same issue: Harris v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
The Court of Appeals affirms the ruling.The case is Gayle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:08 pm
The petition of the day is: Premo v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
Harris Associates [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a shareholder does not have to show that a fund's investment adviser misled the fund's directors in order to have a cognizable claim of an excessive fee under § 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 [ [read post]
