Search for: "Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As a result, an FCA violation allegation does not carry a presumption of correctness. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm by Eric Goldman
Internet Brands, Inc., 824 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 2016) (ISP not immune to failure to warn claim) and Huon v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The endorsement guidelines thus inherently, if covertly, recognize that puffery does work. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am by Bob Ambrogi
v=fz3Gl0-qyU8 (Please note that this demo video is old and does not reflect all of our features of the DataNovo platform.) [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
  1-800 Contacts’ trademark terms have higher conversion rates than non-branded search terms. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm by Alexander Berengaut and Tarek Austin
Does 1-59, for example, hackers unlawfully accessed copyrighted materials on a company’s protected website.[5] The company brought suit against the unknown culprits — named “John Does” in the complaint — for violating the CFAA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Copyright Act.[6] It then provided the court with the internet protocol addresses of each defendant.[7] The court granted the company’s motion that it be allowed… [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:28 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
SIP-IP provides internet and brand management services, which include certification systems to “help ad networks and publishers identify website hosting content without authorization. [read post]