Search for: "Doe v. Lee"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Lee Optical). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:15 am
From People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
In a recent unpublished decision, Lee v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
Bruce Lee enters the frame, encountering a young Sylvester Stallone as Rocky. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(The Doe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has struck down cost considerations, such as Whitman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
Watkins cited Ronnie Lee Johnson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Rossignol v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 1:27 pm
The case is Heim v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:06 am
" The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Lee and Perez) says this is an "appealing proposition," but it also says this is not the law.The Fair Labor Standards Act says the statute is violated when an employer "does not pay overtime wages for work it 'suffers or permits,' that is, work it requires, knows about, or should have known about. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
(Judge VanDyke's opinion today nowhere mentions this sentence, whereas Judge Nguyen's opinion from five years go, which reversed and remanded Pepe's original conviction, does. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
From Hakim v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Lee: The Supreme Court Case that Influenced the Play “A Raisin in the Sun. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is no longer about figuring out the most sensible reading of statutory language; it is instead about dictating how Congress does its work. [read post]