Search for: "Doe v. National Medical Services"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 6:51 pm
HHS (2nd Cir.) -- affirming district court’s decision that Indian Health Service improperly withheld a third-party’s report evaluating agency’s management and administration as a “medical quality assurance record” under 25 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:57 am
Wound Care Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 am
Billing for dental services that have been based on radiographs when a review of the x-rays does not show that the services were medically necessary. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The purpose of these revisions is to comply with the January 24, 2013 Jimmo v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Martinez’s claim for service connection of sleep apnea by relying on a VA medical opinion finding PTSD did not cause sleep apnea. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Martinez’s claim for service connection of sleep apnea by relying on a VA medical opinion finding PTSD did not cause sleep apnea. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBK&C's refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) This was a judicial review of RBK&C's refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Each of these provisions have slightly different conditions attached and each have made their way into the national law of 28 member states in slightly different ways. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:04 pm
This appeal does not involve a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm
Late last week the Illinois Supreme Court (the Court) issued its long-anticipated decision in the case of Provena Covenant Medical Center v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Koch v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 10:48 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
Plaintiffs were not licensed medical or social service professionals. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Doctor’s Data, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 10:43 am
V. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
OCC’s Letter on Uniform Federal Banking Standards On November 9, 2023, the General Counsel of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) issued a letter to the CEOs of all national banks and federal savings associations (“FSAs”) addressing uniform federal banking standards.[13] In the letter, the OCC explains that it is aware that some states have passed laws or taken other actions that “purport to apply to… [read post]
