Search for: "Doe v. Parson" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am by Susan Brenner
Parsons claimed New Jersey Statutes § 2C:14–9C does not contain such an element. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by Francis Pileggi
Vice Chancellor Parsons discussed a number of cases and took on the topic of “Where does Revlon” stand? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
In that event the applicant’s rights are reinforced in two ways: first, by requiring the reviewing officer to give advance notice of a proposed adverse decision and the reasons for it; and, secondly, by allowing the applicant to make both written and oral representations on it.This was supported in Banks v Kingston-Upon-Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443 on the ‘objective’ of Reg 8(2).The meaning of ‘deficiency’ was set out by Carnwath LJ in Hall v… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
In that event the applicant’s rights are reinforced in two ways: first, by requiring the reviewing officer to give advance notice of a proposed adverse decision and the reasons for it; and, secondly, by allowing the applicant to make both written and oral representations on it.This was supported in Banks v Kingston-Upon-Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443 on the ‘objective’ of Reg 8(2).The meaning of ‘deficiency’ was set out by Carnwath LJ in Hall v… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
” Takeaways Disclosure of Material Relationships with Financial Advisors While financial advisors and their clients need to be mindful of the Delaware Court of Chancery’s increasing focus on potential conflicts of interest, this ruling does not generally require disclosure of the aggregate fees paid to a financial advisor by the target and the acquiror for any given period of time (but see In re Art Technology (Oracle) (VC Laster 2010). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:51 pm
The NCAA 2010-2011 Division I Manual does not appear to discuss Social Media/Social Networking Monitoring and/or censorship so I am not sure how any NCAA institution thinks that it is acceptable to monitor and then censor its student-athletes.In Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by jamison
  This is the holding from Parsons v. [read post]