Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans" Results 121 - 140 of 3,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
In Misic, the Ninth Circuit held, “ERISA does not forbid assignment by a beneficiary of his right to reimbursement under a health care plan to the health care provider. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
She regularly designs and presents HIPAA and other risk management, compliance and other training for health plans, employers, health care providers, professional associations and others. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon Last week, Oxford Health Plans filed its opening brief with the Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 10:15 am
This is the first court challenge to a physician-only law since the Supreme Court made clear in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Angela Mauroni
” The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 sets minimum standards for the majority of retirement and health plans in the private industry in order to protect those who have these plans. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:19 am by Jeff Marshall
It does so by reducing payments to providers like Medicare Advantage Plans and by imposing some tax increases on higher income taxpayers. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:13 pm
In 2006, he got married and requested to change his health plan from individual coverage to family coverage so that his wife would be covered. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am by Matthew D. Lee
Title VII does not prohibit employer group health plans from providing abortion services coverage, and many employer group health plans do provide such coverage. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
" Therefore it concluded that the applied-for mark is generic for the Class 35 services "or at least a key aspect of them, namely, providing access to health insurance plans – or health plans – over the Internet. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
§ 651 et seq.) provides that the federal Secretary of Labor shall adopt standards for occupational safety and health, but federal law does not preempt state authority when (1) there is no federal standard or (2) there is a state plan for occupational safety and health that has been approved at the federal level.The federal OSH Act grants the federal Department of Labor the authority to provide and enforce mandatory national standards. (29… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 The Government’s interests in promoting public health and providing women with equal access to health care also cannot be compelling because the contraceptive mandate does not apply to the insurance plans of millions of women in this country.... [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 758 (KB) We saw an injunction being made to prevent Ms Lees from seeking a further mental health crisis moratorium here. [read post]