Search for: "Doe v. Secretary of Air Force"
Results 121 - 140
of 324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
It Entered into force on December 5, 1963. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
The livestream does not air these opinion announcements (except for one time last term when it accidentally did so before an argument), and some home listeners are no doubt wondering why the argument does not begin until 10:08. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
(Many of those factual developments were detailed in our prior post on the case, including female commands of Navy vessels and Air Force fighter squadrons, women’s service aboard aircraft carriers and submarines, and numerous combat roles.) [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Upon entry into force, it will replace the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain that was signed at London on December 22, 1931, and entered into force on June 24, 1935. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Department of the Air Force], the district court should apply a standard of review that is more than rational basis but less than strict scrutiny,” that is, heightened scrutiny. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 2:53 pm
Yesterday, in Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
§ 1189 rests with the Secretary of State and is subject to [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
” Haaretz reports that the Israeli Air Force attacked a Hamas weapons production site in the Gaza Strip, in response to a rocket launched from Gaza early this morning. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
The rule would keep a very substantial number of bona fide young couples apart or forced to live outside the UK, vastly exceeding the number of forced marriages that would be deterred. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Moreover, the majority does not consider the Supreme Court's most recent decision on the issue of agent liability in employee retaliation matters, Staub v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
But FISA does not establish a free-for-all for access to sensitive FISA information. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Section 19 does not give the court power to permit the use of documents that have been provided in breach of a restriction order under section 19. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm
He has not been politically active, perhaps because he was until recently a major in the Air Force. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
Curiously, Judge Kacsmaryk does not engage at all with the law on this point. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court shed light on this in Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court shed light on this in Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting v. [read post]
