Search for: "Doe v. University of Michigan" Results 121 - 140 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Brigitta Burguess
Sildenafil citrate is the phosphodiesterase-V inhibitor more commonly known as the erectile dysfunction drug, Viagra (1). [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:27 pm by Robert S. Gilmore
District Judge Paul Maloney declined to intervene, saying the school’s vaccine mandated does not violate Norris’ fundamental rights and citing Supreme Court precedent in Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Shniderman (University of Michigan Law School; Winston & Strawn LLP) has posted Gun Insurance Mandates and the Second Amendment on SSRN. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cicely Wilson
This case does not involve a diminution of the minority’s ability to participate in the political process.Read More: The Supreme Court Again Fractures Over RaceEuropean Community v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
(As I will argue soon at a Michigan State University law symposium on narrative in corporate law: Winter won the academic debate in regard to the efficacious effect of market discipline and the superfluity of federal regulation of corporate governance, but Cary has carried field, to corporate academics great surprise.) [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
A mere change in the market value of exchanged property does not justify excuse for mutual mistake. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:31 pm
One of my mother’s friends, Margie Pitts Hames,  argued in the Supreme Court  in 1971, in Doe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:51 pm by Suzanne Ito
" Sixteen years ago, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals forbade any consideration of race in admissions to the University of Texas in Hopwood v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm by David Bernstein
It turns out that UT (unlike University of Michigan in the Grutter case) did not give preferences to Native Americans, but did give them to Hispanics. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:52 am
Although his complaint asserted he paid tuition to the University, he did not argue this as a basis for standing in his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment.What does all this mean? [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:32 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Bollinger, where the Court affirmed the ability of University of Michigan Law School to use a race-conscious but individualized review to ensure a “critical mass” of diversity in its student body. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Dave Maass
Other experts signed on to the brief come from Johns Hopkins University, the University of Michigan, Rice University and Purdue. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:54 am by NCC Staff
On June 26, 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 12:18 am
Bollinger, which upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action program in admissions. [read post]