Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 121 - 140 of 15,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
Weaver, 12 N.Y.3d 433, 882 N.Y.S.2d 357, 909 N.E.2d 1195 (May 12, 2009), posted here, is hard to disagree with, too. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:29 am
For persons not covered by number 1., arrested for a third degree felony that does not involve any force or threat of force against a person.Bond: $2,5004. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
This post applies to Indiana cases where the State of Indiana collects child support through the Title IV-D Court. [read post]
A recent ruling on a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) against 1-800 Contacts scrutinizes the brand’s ad tech playbook through an antitrust lens, calling into question the legality of certain private agreements. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by admin
[Previous Months in Review available here: May 12, Apr 12, Mar 12, Feb 12, Jan 12]   By:David A. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am by Robert Black
Florida (1970) the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not require that a jury must consist of 12 jurors—it would later specify in Ballew v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Ahead of  Jan. 1, 2022, when state Proposition 12 begins to prohibit pork sales in California unless they are raised under strict new prohibitions, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is going to rule on whether or not the new state law violates the Commerce Clause. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Mortgage Bankers Association 13-1052Issue: Whether agencies subject to the Administrative Procedure Act are categorically prohibited from revising their interpretative rules unless such revisions are made through notice-and-comment rulemaking. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), at 1. [3] Id. at 26 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [4] Id. at 1. [5] Id. at 4. [6] Id. at 6-7. [7] Id. at 7-8. [8] Id. at 12. [9] Id. at 33 (Alito, J., dissenting). [10] Id. at 23 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [11] Id. at 31 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claims 1 and 9 of the main request, filed on 6 June 2019, read:1. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:30 am by Broc Romanek
Amending Rules 12g-1 through 4 and 12h-3 which govern the procedures relating to registration, termination of registration under Section 12(g), and suspension of reporting obligations under Section 15(d) to reflect the new thresholds established by the JOBS Act 2. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The period for public comment on the proposed rule expires at the close of business on July 12, 2013. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:03 am
Defendant was stopped more than 12" from the curb with somebody leaning through the passenger window talking to him. [read post]